Pixley
People v. Pixley
Opinion
Opinion
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In 2005, pursuant to a plea bargain, petitioner pleaded guilty to six counts of a
forcible lewd act on a child under 14. (§ 288, subd. (b).) In exchange, the prosecution
dismissed 12 counts of a nonforcible lewd act on a child under 14 (§ 288, subd. (a)) as
well as a multiple victim sentencing allegation (former § 667.61, subd. (e)(5), Stats.
1998, ch. 936, § 9, pp. 6874-6876; see now § 667.61, subd. (e)(4)).
This and all further statutory citations are to the Penal Code.
2 The plea bargain provided for a sentence of 36 years in prison (the midterm of six
years on each count, run consecutively). The trial court sentenced petitioner accordingly.
Section 1170.91 went into effect on January 1, 2019. (Stats. 2018, ch. 523, § 1,
p. 3830.) Later in 2019, petitioner filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to section
1170.91. He alleged that he had served in the United States Navy and that he suffered
from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance abuse as a result.
In 2020, the trial court denied the petition. It ruled that petitioner was not entitled
to resentencing because he had entered into a plea bargain that included a…