People v. Anderson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2022C093934California1,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 3/4/22 P. v. Anderson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C093934

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 17F3799, 18F8075, 19F1009) v.

STONEY ALLEN ANDERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Stoney Allen Anderson filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We ordered supplemental briefing regarding two perceived sentencing errors; the parties agree in their briefing that the record evinces errors and that the case should be remanded with directions to the trial court to rectify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.