Kim

Kim v. Hulett CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2022D078356California4,303 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 3/7/22 Kim v. Hulett CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN M. KIM, D078356

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- JEFFREY HULETT, 00056803-CU-HR-NC)

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Wendy M. Behan, Judge. Affirmed. Sahagun Law and Bryan Owens Sahagun for Plaintiff and Appellant. Law Offices of Bryan W. Pease and Bryan W. Pease for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff John M. Kim appeals the award of attorney fees and costs to defendant Jeffrey Hulett after the trial court granted in part and denied in part Hulett’s anti-SLAPP1 motion (anti-SLAPP Motion) under Code of Civil

Procedure section 425.16.2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.