Amlap ST LLC v. Asset Management Consultants Inc. CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2022B309770California1,033 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/7/22 Amlap ST LLC v. Asset Management Consultants Inc. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

AMLAP ST LLC et al., B309770

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC459858) v.

ASSET MANAGEMENT

CONSULTANTS INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Daniel J. Buckley, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Catanzarite Law Corporation, Kenneth J. Catanzarite, Nicole M. Catanzarite-Woodward and Eric V. Anderton for Plaintiffs and Appellants Amlap ST, LLC and Superstition Lookout Delaware, LLC. Jackson Tidus and Charles M. Clark for Defendants and Respondents Asset Management Consultants, Inc., BH & Sons, LLC, James…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.