Ussec

Ussec v. Pritzker Levine LLP

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 202220-17419California3,473 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE No. 20-17419

COMMISSION,

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00223-RS Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PRITZKER LEVINE LLP,

Appellant,

______________________________

SUSAN L. UECKER,

Receiver-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 21, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: WATFORD and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and BAKER,** International Trade Judge. Dissent by Judge BAKER.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable M. Miller Baker, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. In 2015, Allan Young, represented by Pritzker Levine LLP (“Pritzker”), sued

Thomas Henderson and the San Francisco Regional Center, LLC (“SFRC”) in

California state court,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.