Luis Ramirez Barragan v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 202218-72891California670 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS ANGEL RAMIREZ BARRAGAN, No. 18-72891

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-967-444

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 18, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS,** District Judge.

Luis Angel Ramirez Barragan (“Petitioner”) petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his application for protection

under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and denial of his motion for

remand. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. the case, we do not recite them here.

We review factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.