Brian Ballentine v. Christopher Tucker
Opinion
Opinion
Wallace, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRIAN BALLENTINE; CATALINO No. 20-16805
DAZO; KELLY PATTERSON,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01584- and APG-EJY
GAIL SACCO,
Plaintiff, OPINION
v.
CHRISTOPHER T. TUCKER, Detective, Defendant-Appellee,
and
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT; MIKE WALLACE,
Sergeant; JOHN LIBERTY, Lieutenant, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 21, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed March 8, 2022
Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and J. Clifford Wallace and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Wallace
SUMMARY *
Civil Rights
The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s summary judgment, on qualified immunity grounds, for Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Detective Christopher Tucker in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging, in part, that Tucker violated plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights when he arrested them in retaliation for their chalking…