Amy Strayer v. Idaho State Patrol

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 202221-35247California1,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 8 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMY E. STRAYER; et al., No. 21-35247

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00450-DWM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

IDAHO STATE PATROL; MICHAEL

ARCHER, Trooper,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

SPOKANE COUNTY; et al.,

Defendants.

AMY E. STRAYER; et al., No. 21-35343

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00450-DWM

v.

IDAHO STATE PATROL; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 16, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,** S.R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

In this Fourth Amendment excessive-force case, three plaintiffs sued five

defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under Idaho tort law. The district court

dismissed every claim raised by every plaintiff. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.