Amy Strayer v. Idaho State Patrol
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 202221-35247California1,439 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 8 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AMY E. STRAYER; et al., No. 21-35247
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00450-DWM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
IDAHO STATE PATROL; MICHAEL
ARCHER, Trooper,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
SPOKANE COUNTY; et al.,
Defendants.
AMY E. STRAYER; et al., No. 21-35343
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00450-DWM
v.
IDAHO STATE PATROL; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 16, 2022 San Francisco, California
Before: SILER,** S.R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
In this Fourth Amendment excessive-force case, three plaintiffs sued five
defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under Idaho tort law. The district court
dismissed every claim raised by every plaintiff. We…