Enriquez
Enriquez v. Sholokhova CA1/5
Opinion
Opinion
Burns, J.
Filed 3/9/22 Enriquez v. Sholokhova CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
VICTOR ENRIQUEZ,
Plaintiff and Appellant, A162372 v. YELENA SHOLOKHOVA, (San Mateo County Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. 19-FAM-01592B)
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Victor Enriquez and respondent Yelena Sholokhova have a child together. In the parties’ action to establish parentage of the child, the trial court ordered Enriquez to pay debts he owed Sholokhova and to refinance a car loan to remove Sholokhova from the loan. The sole issue raised by Enriquez on appeal is whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the car and debts when it issued the order.