United States v. Crescencio Mendoza

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202221-30018California876 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 9 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 21-30018 21-30019 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:19-cr-00004-IM-1 v. 3:18-cr-00543-IM-

CRESCENCIO MENDOZA, AKA

Crescencio Mendoza-Carreon, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 17, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS,** District Judge.

Crescencio Mendoza-Carreon (Mendoza-Carreon) appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion to dismiss an indictment alleging that he

unlawfully reentered the United States after being removed to Mexico, in violation

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.