Silvano Lee v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202216-72448California1,292 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 9 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILVANO CANUELA LEE, No. 16-72448

Petitioner, Agency No. A203-235-910

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Silvano Canuela Lee (“Lee”), a native and citizen of the Philippines,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) final removal

order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.