Jose Mercado-Marcelo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202220-73658California770 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MERCADO-MARCELO, No. 20-73658

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-671-606

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Jose Mercado Marcelo timely seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Christina Reiss, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. ("IJ") entry of an order of removal and denial of relief from removal. Where, as

here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.