Chaomin Li v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202220-72691California734 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHAOMIN LI, No. 20-72691

Petitioner, Agency No. A209-417-051

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2022** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: HAWKINS, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Chaomin Li, a citizen of China, petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) order upholding the denial of his claims for asylum

based on an adverse credibility determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252, and we deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review adverse credibility determinations and the attendant factual

findings under the “substantial evidence” standard.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.