Antonio Zacarias Gonzalez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202220-72267California492 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 9 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO ZACARIAS GONZALEZ; No. 20-72267

ANDRE YOVANY ZACARIAS

MONTEJO, AKA Andres Yovany Zacarias Agency Nos. A076-705-379 Montejo, A208-178-545

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.

Petitioners Antonio Zacarias Gonzalez (“Zacarias Gonzalez”) and his son,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Christina Reiss, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. Andre Yovany Zacarias Montejo (“Zacarias Montejo”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.