Abolhassan Hassanzadeh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 202220-72315California535 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 9 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABOLHASSAN HASSANZADEH, No. 20-72315

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-670-752

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Abolhassan Hassanzadeh, a native and citizen of Iran, seeks

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Christina Reiss, United States District Judge for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation. immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.