Marcus Gray v. Katheryn Hudson
28 F.4th 87
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202220-55401California6,593 words
Opinion
Opinion
M. SMITH, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Marcus Gray, PKA Flame; No. 20-55401
EMANUEL LAMBERT; CHIKE
OJUKWU, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:15-cv-05642-
CAS-JC
v.
KATHERYN ELIZABETH HUDSON, OPINION
PKA Katy Perry; JORDAN HOUSTON, PKA Juicy J; LUKASZ GOTTWALD, PKA Dr. Luke; SARAH THERESA
HUDSON; KARL MARTIN SANDBERG,
PKA Max Martin; HENRY RUSSELL WALTER, PKA Cirkut; KASZ
MONEY, INC.; CAPITOL RECORDS,
LLC; WB MUSIC CORP.; KOBALT
MUSIC PUBLISHING AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 11, 2022 Pasadena, California
Filed March 10, 2022 Before: RICHARD R. CLIFTON, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., and PAUL J. WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.
SUMMARY *
Copyright
The panel affirmed the district court’s order vacating a jury’s award of damages for copyright infringement and granting judgment as a matter of law to Katheryn Hudson (pka Katy Perry) and other defendants.