Veeva Systems v. Medidata Solutions CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 2022A158736California8,367 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 3/10/22 Veeva Systems v. Medidata Solutions CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A158736, A159062

v. MEDIDATA SOLUTIONS, INC. et (Alameda County al., Super. Ct. No. RG17868081) Defendants and Appellants.

Veeva Systems, Inc. (Veeva) sued Medidata Solutions, Inc. (Medidata) and Sparta Systems, Inc. (Sparta) (collectively defendants) for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that defendants’ use and enforcement of noncompete and nondisclosure agreements (NCA/NDAs) against their former employees violate Business and Professions Code section 16600.1 Defendants moved to strike Veeva’s operative complaint under the anti-SLAPP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.