Xiao Zheng v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202216-72670California364 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIAO ZHENG, a/k/a XIAO FENG ZHENG, No. 16-72670

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-767-608

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

Xiao Zheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the order of an Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We

deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.