United States v. Christopher Nickalaskey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-30096California549 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30096

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:17-cr-00179-TMB-DMS-1 v. 3:17-cr-00179-TMB-DMS

CHRISTOPHER JAMES NICKALASKEY,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 17, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge. Christopher James Nickalaskey appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion to suppress evidence found

during his encounter with police on November 24, 2017. The parties are familiar

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.