Surinder Pal v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-70775California664 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 10 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURINDER PAL, No. 21-70775

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-907-699

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Surinder Pal, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for withholding of removal and relief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to

8 U.S.C. § 1252. Our review is “limited to the BIA’s decision, except to the extent

that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.