Michael Alves v. Hewlett-Packard Comprehensive

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-55476California623 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 10 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ALVES, No. 21-55476

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-09136-RGK-JEM v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD MEMORANDUM*

COMPREHENSIVE WELFARE

BENEFITS PLAN; HEWLETT-

PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 7, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Michael Alves appeals the district court’s ruling that Sedgwick Claims

Management Services, Inc. (“Sedgwick”), the ERISA plan administrator of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hewlett-Packard Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan (the “Plan”), did not abuse

its discretion in denying Alves’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.