Julio Garcia Sandoval v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-70772California651 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIO CESAR GARCIA SANDOVAL, No. 21-70772
Petitioner, Agency No. A206-150-319
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 8, 2022** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Julio Garcia Sandoval seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of
protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We review both the BIA and IJ’s factual findings under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the substantial evidence standard, see Iman v. Barr, 972 F.3d 1058, 1064…