Julio Garcia Sandoval v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-70772California651 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR GARCIA SANDOVAL, No. 21-70772

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-150-319

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Julio Garcia Sandoval seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We review both the BIA and IJ’s factual findings under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the substantial evidence standard, see Iman v. Barr, 972 F.3d 1058, 1064…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.