Ignacio Ramirez-Larius v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202220-70549California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IGNACIO RAMIREZ-LARIUS, No. 20-70549

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-222-932

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Ignacio Ramirez-Larius (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. upholding the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for withholding of

removal and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.