Gerard Cellette v. Dale Pomerantz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-56135California505 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GERARD F. CELLETTE, No. 21-56135
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-04013-SB-MAR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DALE POMERANTZ, Board of Parole Hearings (Officer), official capacity; NEAL CHAMBERS, Board of Parole Hearings (Officer), official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Gerard F. Cellette appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing his
due process and ex post facto claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…