Gerard Cellette v. Dale Pomerantz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 202221-56135California505 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 10 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARD F. CELLETTE, No. 21-56135

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-04013-SB-MAR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DALE POMERANTZ, Board of Parole Hearings (Officer), official capacity; NEAL CHAMBERS, Board of Parole Hearings (Officer), official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Gerard F. Cellette appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing his

due process and ex post facto claims in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.