Singh

Singh v. Bains CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 2022F082506California905 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/10/22 Singh v. Bains CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DALJIT SINGH,

F082506

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 20CECG01693) v.

GURPAUL SINGH BAINS, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Mark E. Cullers, Judge. Gurpaul Singh Bains, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. John L. Migliazzo for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Peña, Acting P.J., Smith, J. and DeSantos, J. Defendant Gurpaul Singh Bains appeals from a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) protecting plaintiff Daljit Singh (defendant’s former employer) and plaintiff’s wife and son. Defendant also challenges the denial of his peremptory challenge to the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.