Diocese of San Joaquin v. Snell CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 2022F079871California8,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Snauffer, J.

Filed 3/11/22 Diocese of San Joaquin v. Snell CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIOCESE OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al.,

F079871

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. 10CECG00908) v.

JAMES SNELL, et al., OPINION Defendants and Appellants;

THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH,

Intervener and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Rosemary T. McGuire, Judge. Law Office of Peter Sean Bradley and Peter Sean Bradley for Defendants and Appellants. Ragghianti Freitas, Michael O. Glass, Sarah N. Léger; Overstreet & Associates, David M. Overstreet; Litigation Engineered and Chester E. Walls for Plaintiffs and Respondents and Intervener and Respondent. -ooOoo- In this case, a local church has disaffiliated itself…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.