United States v. Darlene Sturdevant
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 202221-35329California338 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAR 11 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-35329
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cv-01909-JO 3:18-cr-00223-JO-1 v.
DARLENE MICHELLE STURDEVANT, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-35330
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cv-01910-JO 3:19-cr-00254-JO-1 v.
DARLENE MICHELLE STURDEVANT,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted March 9, 2022** Portland, Oregon
Before: GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.
Petitioner Darlene Sturdevant appeals the district court’s denial of her
petition for habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2255. Reviewing the
district court’s denial de novo, United States v. Chacon-Palomares, 208 F.3d 1157,