United States v. Darlene Sturdevant

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 202221-35329California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 11 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-35329

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cv-01909-JO 3:18-cr-00223-JO-1 v.

DARLENE MICHELLE STURDEVANT, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-35330

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cv-01910-JO 3:19-cr-00254-JO-1 v.

DARLENE MICHELLE STURDEVANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted March 9, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges, and REISS,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Darlene Sturdevant appeals the district court’s denial of her

petition for habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2255. Reviewing the

district court’s denial de novo, United States v. Chacon-Palomares, 208 F.3d 1157,

1158…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.