Peters

Peters v. City of Beaumont CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2022E075845California5,848 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/14/22 Peters v. City of Beaumont CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CHARLES PETERS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E075845

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1707116)

CITY OF BEAUMONT, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Irma Poole Asberry,

Judge. Affirmed.

Charles Peters, in pro. per.; Law Offices of Joe Estrada and Joe Estrada, for

Plaintiff and Appellant.

Slovak Baron Empey Murphy & Pinkney, Shaun M. Murphy and Brent S.

Clemmer for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff and appellant Charles Peters (Peters) appeals the sustaining of the

demurrer in favor of defendant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.