United States v. Mark Beebe

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-10098California369 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10098

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:14-cr-00690-DKW-4 v. 15-cr-635

MARK KALANI BEEBE,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Derrick Kahala Watson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Mark Kalani Beebe timely appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion for release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Reviewing for

abuse of discretion, United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) (per

curiam), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). After the district court issued its original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.