United States v. John Keinath

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-30050California308 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30050

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00182-MJP-1 v.

JOHN CHARLES KEINATH, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2022** Portland, Oregon

Before: GRABER, BEA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Defendant John Keinath timely appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Reviewing for abuse

of discretion, United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) (per

curiam), we vacate and remand for reconsideration.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). After the district court issued its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.