United States v. Crispin Torres, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-50074California771 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50074
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:20-cr-02114-LAB-1 v.
CRISPIN TORRES, JR., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2022** Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Crispin Torres appeals from his 48-month sentence for conspiracy
to commit securities fraud arising from his involvement in a large Ponzi scheme. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Guideline range. Under § 2B1.1(a)(2) of the United States Sentencing