Neo4j, Inc. v. Purethink, LLC

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

NEO4J, INC.; NEO4J SWEDEN AB, No. 21-16029

Plaintiffs-counter- D.C. No. 5:18-cv-07182-EJD defendants-Appellees, Northern District of California, San Jose v.

ORDER

PURETHINK, LLC; IGOV, INC.; JOHN

MARK SUHY,

Defendants-counter- claimants-Appellants.

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,* District Judge.

The memorandum disposition filed on February 18, 2022 is amended as follows:

• At page 1, lines 1–2, the phrase “and three corporations, PureThink, LLC, iGov, Inc., and Graph Foundation, Inc.” is replaced by “and, as relevant here, two corporations, PureThink, LLC, and iGov, Inc.”

• At page 2, line 1, footnote 1 has been added, which reads, “An action stating substantially the same claims against another corporation, Graph Foundation, Inc. (“GFI”), settled.”

• At page 2, line 14, the phrase “not Neo4j® Enterprise Edition” has been deleted.

• At page 2, footnote 2, the phrase “to denote the Neo4j USA-licensed platforms, Neo4j® Community…