Morris Wilner v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202220-56400California451 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MORRIS WILNER, No. 20-56400

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-01688-CJC-DFM v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a MEMORANDUM* corporation,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

HUNTINGTON BEACH FORD, a business entity, form unknown; DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2022** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Morris Wilner appeals the district court’s denial of his ex parte application

to vacate an order dismissing Wilner’s claims without prejudice.

We lack jurisdiction to hear Wilner’s appeal because the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.