Mario Mejia-Miranda v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-70828California504 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIO WILFREDO MEJIA-MIRANDA, No. 21-70828

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-311-254

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 9, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,*** District Judge.

Mario Mejia-Miranda, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.