Juan Arreaga Puac v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202216-71238California716 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS ARREAGA PUAC, No. 16-71238

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-357-326

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK,*** District Judge.

Juan Carlos Arreaga Puac, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of withholding of removal.1 “When the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.