Josefina Nino Bibiano v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202215-73128California405 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEFINA NINO BIBIANO; MARLON No. 15-73128

NINO BIBIANO,

Agency Nos. A202-098-224 Petitioners, A202-098-225

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Josefina Nino Bibiano and derivatively her son, natives and citizens of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing

their appeal from the Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.