Jose Ramiro-Ramirez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202220-71154California925 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE RAMIRO-RAMIREZ, No. 20-71154

Petitioner, Agency No. A093-161-151

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, PARKER,*** and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ramiro-Ramirez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Barrington D. Parker, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation. proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under

8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.