Jesus Jimenez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202220-72537California1,041 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS CIRINO JIMENEZ, No. 20-72537

Petitioner, Agency No. A075-304-442

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 10, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s

(“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings,

meaning “we must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.