Jamey Perry v. Richard Gottlieb

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-55513California479 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMEY PERRY, No. 21-55513

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-02996-GW-AGR v.

RICHARD J. GOTTLIEB, in individual MEMORANDUM* capacity; in representative capacity as trustee of the Richard J. Gottlieb Separate Property Trust dated July 30, 2018,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and MOLLOY,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Jamey Perry appeals from a final order of dismissal, following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.