Humberto Castro Vasquez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202215-72793California600 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 14 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUMBERTO CASTRO VASQUEZ, No. 15-72793

Petitioner, Agency No. A201-175-154

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 9, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Humberto Castro Vasquez seeks review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an immigration judge (IJ)

denying his claims for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Because the

BIA adopted and affirmed the decision of the IJ without opinion, we review the

decision of the IJ as if it were the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.