George Dragan v. William Valladolid

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-55387California1,293 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE DRAGAN, an individual; KIRILL No. 21-55387 DRAGAN, an individual, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:18-cv-00448-MWF-FFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM VALLADOLID, an individual,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

TROJAN INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company;

MIKHAIL SOSINSKY; ANNA

SOSINSKY; DOES,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2022** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Defendant William Valladolid appeals the district court’s decision granting

Plaintiffs George Dragan and Kirill Dragan’s (collectively, the Dragans) partial

motion for summary judgment and denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.