Christensen Law Offices, LLC v. Eric Christensen
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202221-15887California1,014 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTENSEN LAW OFFICES, LLC, No. 21-15887
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00424-JCM-BNW v.
ERIC CHRISTENSEN; ELMINA ANN MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTENSEN,
Defendants-third-party- plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
INSURANCE COMPANY; et al.,
Third-party-defendants- Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 17, 2022** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: SILER,*** S.R. THOMAS, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Christensen Law Offices, LLC (CLO) appeals the district court order denying
its motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM.