Bolorsukh Munkhtumur v. Merrick Garland

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOLORSUKH MUNKHTUMUR; No. 18-71377

BAATARTSOGT ERDENETSETSEG,

Agency Nos. A088-558-350 Petitioners, A088-558-351

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 9, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: NGUYEN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Bolorsukh Munkhtumur and Baatartsogt Erdenetsetseg petition for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their motion to reopen. We

review the BIA’s decision to deny a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). will reverse only if the decision was arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.

Agonafer v.…