Gossett

Gossett v. Jackson CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2022E073838California5,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/14/22 Gossett v. Jackson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

RACHEL GOSSETT as Co-trustee, etc. et al.,

E073838

Petitioners and Respondents, (Super.Ct.No. MCP1300789) v.

OPINION

CHRISTOPHER ADAM JACKSON as Co-trustee, etc. et al.,

Objectors and Appellants.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John G. Evans, Judge.

As to Chapter Jackson, judgment affirmed; as to Christopher Adam Jackson, appeal

dismissed, motion for sanctions granted, and remanded with directions.

Law Office of Angela Swan, and Angela Swan for Objectors and Appellants.

The Grossman Law Firm, Scott M. Grossman; Jeff Lewis Law, Jeffrey Lewis and

Sean C. Rotstan for Petitioners and Respondents.

The ongoing probate dispute that forms the basis of this appeal involves…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.