Marjory Johns v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202221-35488California793 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARJORY JOHNS; JOANNE MANCHA, No. 21-35488

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00006-SEH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 11, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: NGUYEN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs Marjory Johns and Joanne Mancha, residents of Minnesota, took

out an insurance policy through an agent of Illinois Farmers Insurance Company in

Minneapolis. The two were passengers when one of their insured vehicles crashed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). outside of Bozeman, Montana. The plaintiffs sued Illinois Farmers in the District

of Montana, seeking a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.