Juan Gomez v. Scott Frauenheim

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202220-15088California860 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN GOMEZ, No. 20-15088

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-03021-EMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 9, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Juan Gomez seeks review of a district court judgment denying his petition for

a writ of habeas corpus. We certified for appeal the question of whether Gomez’s

“trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by conceding guilt on all three counts

of oral copulation with a child.” We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and

2253. We review de novo a district court’s denial of a habeas petition, see Lopez v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Thompson, 202 F.3d 1110, 1116…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.