Jose Razo-Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202215-73857California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE RAZO-MARTINEZ, AKA Jose No. 15-73857 Martinez Razo, Agency No. A200-242-866 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON, TALLMAN, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Jose Razo-Martinez (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

upholding the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.