Hofit Kaspi v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202220-70146California1,030 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HOFIT ETY KASPI; ELIZER KASPI, No. 20-70146

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A094-872-183

A094-872-184

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 11, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Elizer and Hofit Kaspi seek review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order of removal.

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Validity of Visa Petition. Petitioners argue that the United States

Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) revocation of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.