Gloria Recinos-Ulloa v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202219-72003California835 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GLORIA ESTELA RECINOS-ULLOA; No. 19-72003

KEVIN ADONAY RIVERA-RECINOS,

Agency Nos. A208-566-896 Petitioners, A208-566-895

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 16, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,** District Judge.

Gloria Recinos-Ulloa (“Recinos-Ulloa”) and Kevin Rivera-Recinos (“Rivera-

Recinos”) seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision

dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of protection under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.