Francisco Guzman-Chicas v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 202217-72049California776 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 15 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANCISCO GUZMAN-CHICAS, No. 17-72049
Petitioner, Agency No. A205-975-980
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 9, 2022** Seattle, Washington
Before: NGUYEN, MILLER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Francisco Guzman-Chicas petitions for review of a Board of Immigration
Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his withholding of removal and Convention
Against Torture (“CAT”) claims. We review the BIA’s denials of relief for
“substantial evidence.” Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2014). To reverse the BIA, “evidence [must] not only support[] a contrary
conclusion, but…